Skip to main content

Ninth Time's the Charm!

And the winner is, #9!
This morning I reread the first chapter in Patti Mollica's book, How to Paint Fast, Loose, and Bold, in preparation for today's composition practice. I have to admit, doing the pear again sounded pretty boring and I really wasn't looking forward to it, but I'm SO BORED of the day in and day out sameness of sheltering in place that I decided my daily composition couldn't be any worse. Besides, I was curious about one of the methods Mollica suggests: using white and black drawing tools on gray paper.

I knew I had bought a gray sketchbook last year that I'd never used; took 30 minutes to find it. And I remembered the cutest Conte Crayon stocking stuffer I had bought, I don't know, 10 years ago and had never used (seeing a pattern here?), and luckily we still had a pear in the house. (By the way, I've been drawing Packham pears, which are quite oddly shaped.)

Today I decided to work in a square format, thinking that maybe, eventually, I'd have a composition I really liked, and maybe I'd figured out how to paint it in a way I liked, and then I could make a "real" painting on one of the 6" Ampersand boards I've had laying around since I tried oils a couple of years ago. OK, everything is ready to go; let's do this!

First one, values are "real" but it doesn't read as a pear. Second one, reads as a pear but it's a boring 50/50 split of white and gray. Third one, doesn't read as pear. WAIT A MINUTE. Why is this so hard to do? UGH. Fourth one, interesting, but the square is divided in half. Fifth one, mostly mid tone and OK but kind of boring. Sixth one, mostly dark and OK but still kind of boring. THIS IS INSANE. It's just a single stupid pear with a single light on it. Time for lunch.

Back to the drawing board. Made the pear a little bigger in the frame and decided to add a simple table edge behind the pear to break up the space. I also moved the light and decided to take a little creative license with the shadow on the pear. Number seven, I like the two values on the pear but not the light/dark contrast. Eight, used three values on the pear and don't like that at all. Number nine, I FINALLY get a value pattern that I like, that reads pear, that has one value (mid) bigger than the others, and that feels good to me. I could see painting this.

It took me NINE value drawings to get there! I'm a smart person, really. I don't understand why this has been such a challenge for me. Luckily I gave myself only five minutes for each drawing, so I still got this done in less than an hour, but seriously. I can't even imagine how hard this will be when I have two items in the frame. Maybe tomorrow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Back on Track with My Value Studies

Value studies #14, #15, #16. I thought I was getting better, but then I realized they really don't look like anything. Oh no.  Took a little break there. Not a good one. Prescription drug-related side effects. But I've got the issues worked out (I hope) and I'm back to work on my year of value studies. (I'm also rereading " Coaching the Artist Within ," by Eric Maisel, which is a GREAT book to use to tame the inner critic so that you/I can get back to making art.) A few days ago I watched a great promo teaching video from the Tucson Art Academy Online on value. Afterwards, I created three value studies from vacation photos. Studies #14 and #15 are from the same photo, but they don't read as masses that make up an interesting scene. Study #16 reads as three distinct value masses, but you really don't know what it is (a canyon in Zion). I'll need to think about these some more. Barn near Holdener Park, Livermore, CA Meanwhile, I reread ...

Value Epiphany!

For the new year, I've decided that before I start a painting, I'll note the goals for that painting session and/or the finished product if I'm not painting alla prima (in one session). I've sort of informally been doing this for the last couple of months, but now I want to consciously follow these steps: 1) write down my goals, 2) paint, 3) acknowledge that the painting is crap ( see previous post ), 4) note how I did or did not meet my goals, and finally, 5) create a next steps list. Of course, these steps won't be executed until I've done the all-important value studies! Last October I painted a lesson from Dreama Tolle Perry's Flow class , a cute carafe of cream with a white ceramic basket of strawberries. The basket didn't read "white" in my painting, which I didn't like, and I wanted to figure out why...but I wanted to use my own still life to do it.  So I set up a scene informed by Dreama but all my own. My scene used my own props to...

Finishing My Acrylic Complementary Study

I'm rereading Carlson's Guide to Landscape Painting, as I've decided that I really miss painting landscapes, especially in plein air, but the reason I stopped doing it was because I wasn't happy with my results and I wasn't making progress (ugh, watercolors!). Carlson's book is  DENSE. I gave up highlighting it because almost every paragraph would need a highlight, but I am typing up notes as I read, with the hopes of eventually creating a cheat sheet for myself.  One of the first lessons he writes about is his "theory of angles," where, for an average landscape, the sky, ground, trees, and mountains have certain relative values. Thinking about the six studies I just completed , I realized that I had arbitrarily assigned the sky a mid value, to make the house more the focal point, but according to Carlson, the sky should be the lightest value of the natural objects. Oops. So I redid the value study, using his theory. I kind of like it. Looks more ...