Skip to main content

Mean Critic Meets Scary Progress

I'm continuing to work on my value studies and bouncing all over the place, both with subject and with medium. I swear that one of these days I'll find my lane. There are things I like and dislike about oils, acrylic, and watercolor. There's not a perfect medium, but oils sure are easier for working on composition and value. 

As the year is coming to an end, I'm wrapping some things up and getting ready to launch other things. I went through my last three years of paintings (about 150) and categorized them as keep for myself, make available for gifts or purchase, or repurpose (at first I had labeled them trash, but that just seemed so mean, and I really can use the paper for other things). With the gift/sell category, I created a PowerPoint file with all available paintings, categorized by subject. Each was labeled and priced...a scary declaration on my part that my creativity is valuable. In the coming year, I will use this file to create a new website for my growing art practice.

I recently sent the PowerPoint file to a friend, offering her a painting as a birthday gift. It was a scary step in my artistic path! But we talked yesterday, and she is excited to choose something. And I was excited to hear that there was more than one painting that interested her. I look forward to a socially distant, masked meeting, where she can see the paintings in person and make a choice (after the new year, when the Covid cases are declining; thank you, scientists, for a vaccine).

Another thing I've been working on is to come to terms with how critical I am with my art, especially right when I've finished painting. My first reaction is always, this is CRAP. So for the new year, I've decided to embrace my mean inner critic in a new way. Before starting a new painting, I'm going to note the goal for the painting (such as, follow my value plan and use a limited palette). Then, when I'm done painting, I will announce to myself, "this is CRAP." Once I've given that mean inner critic a voice, then I'll be able to logically move on (maybe in a day or two) and look at the painting to see if I met the goal for that painting and what I want to do next. I've sort of been doing this informally, but I haven't acknowledged the critic, sat with it, accepted it, then MOVED ON. 

The irony, of course, is that my mean first voice is so inaccurate! And to bring this post full circle, one of the paintings my friend is considering is one that I had pushed aside as lame and forgotten about. It wasn't until I was cataloging my art that I came across it again and thought it was a really sweet painting, and that someone would smile having it hanging in their home. So what did my critic not like about it? It was too simple, it didn't have a background, it would never be appropriate for entry into a national show, and it wasn't profound. Now, almost a year and a half later, I can see the beauty in this painting. But more than that, I can see the beauty that was in me, at the time when I painted it, that I never acknowledged and never appreciated. It's sad, when I think about it, and it has really derailed my growth as an artist. I really, truly want to work on this inner critic. I want peace, for myself and for my creativity. It's time.

Comments

  1. DianaDecember 18, 2020 at 10:22 AM

    Andrea,

    The only thing that outmatches your artistic talent is your BIG heart!

    It's been fun to see your paintings over the years. You are always challenging yourself, and your pieces reflect that. Please give your "mean critic" a rest, you have so much to be proud of, my friend.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Back on Track with My Value Studies

Value studies #14, #15, #16. I thought I was getting better, but then I realized they really don't look like anything. Oh no.  Took a little break there. Not a good one. Prescription drug-related side effects. But I've got the issues worked out (I hope) and I'm back to work on my year of value studies. (I'm also rereading " Coaching the Artist Within ," by Eric Maisel, which is a GREAT book to use to tame the inner critic so that you/I can get back to making art.) A few days ago I watched a great promo teaching video from the Tucson Art Academy Online on value. Afterwards, I created three value studies from vacation photos. Studies #14 and #15 are from the same photo, but they don't read as masses that make up an interesting scene. Study #16 reads as three distinct value masses, but you really don't know what it is (a canyon in Zion). I'll need to think about these some more. Barn near Holdener Park, Livermore, CA Meanwhile, I reread ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Value Epiphany!

For the new year, I've decided that before I start a painting, I'll note the goals for that painting session and/or the finished product if I'm not painting alla prima (in one session). I've sort of informally been doing this for the last couple of months, but now I want to consciously follow these steps: 1) write down my goals, 2) paint, 3) acknowledge that the painting is crap ( see previous post ), 4) note how I did or did not meet my goals, and finally, 5) create a next steps list. Of course, these steps won't be executed until I've done the all-important value studies! Last October I painted a lesson from Dreama Tolle Perry's Flow class , a cute carafe of cream with a white ceramic basket of strawberries. The basket didn't read "white" in my painting, which I didn't like, and I wanted to figure out why...but I wanted to use my own still life to do it.  So I set up a scene informed by Dreama but all my own. My scene used my own props to...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finishing My Acrylic Complementary Study

I'm rereading Carlson's Guide to Landscape Painting, as I've decided that I really miss painting landscapes, especially in plein air, but the reason I stopped doing it was because I wasn't happy with my results and I wasn't making progress (ugh, watercolors!). Carlson's book is  DENSE. I gave up highlighting it because almost every paragraph would need a highlight, but I am typing up notes as I read, with the hopes of eventually creating a cheat sheet for myself.  One of the first lessons he writes about is his "theory of angles," where, for an average landscape, the sky, ground, trees, and mountains have certain relative values. Thinking about the six studies I just completed , I realized that I had arbitrarily assigned the sky a mid value, to make the house more the focal point, but according to Carlson, the sky should be the lightest value of the natural objects. Oops. So I redid the value study, using his theory. I kind of like it. Looks more ...
Post a Comment
Read more