Skip to main content

Her Rose, My Rose

 As mentioned in my last post, I've signed up for Dreama Tolle Perry's Flow class. My intention with this class is to watch one of her demos and replay it while I paint along with it, recreating "her" painting. Then I plan to take what I learned in that demo and create "my" version. Eventually, I'd like to paint my version in oil, acrylics, and watercolor...trying to figure out which medium I prefer. 

The first oil painting demo I chose to watch was a backlit rose in a small glass jar. I love roses, and when I ventured into oils the first time, I painted a lovely rose from my garden. This is the only painting from that era that I liked. As a side note, I have nine hybrid tea roses and four floribundas around the house. And since I'm in northern California, there are blooms on these plants for nine months out of the year! What a treat.  I really should paint these beauties more often. 


I'm happy with both paintings but for different reasons. The pink roses are from Dreama's lesson. I'd say that she's a colorist, and that color is her first priority. This really shows up in the lovely grayed purples in the flowers and the exciting turquoise accents in the vase and leaves. Now that I'm writing this and really looking at it, I can see that these additions are really beautiful...and lost in my version. 

However, I really like my version and am proud of myself. Better yet, I actually ENJOYED myself while painting it, and that is what I've been searching for! I love the roses themselves (Voodoo hybrid tea, from my garden) and the transitions in the warm colors. I prefer the cool, grayed complementary background color, which I think makes the warm roses really pop, to Dreama's analogous background, which brings the focus more to the vase. (Part of this is my painting technique; her rendition wasn't this analogous.) I don't usually work with backlit subjects as I prefer stronger value shifts and side lighting. Lastly, those leaves. Although I like the value changes in the greens, they certainly lack the excitement of Dreama's turquoise. 

There's more to learn from this lesson. Writing this has helped me see where I need to go next, which is why I started this blog. I need to:

  • Do a charcoal three-value study for my version, making artistic decisions about how I want to distribute the values instead of blindly following my photograph.
  • Focus on adding some exciting color, especially some tones in the shadows and vibrancy in the highlights.  

There will definitely be more rose paintings in my future. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mean Critic Meets Scary Progress

I'm continuing to work on my value studies and bouncing all over the place, both with subject and with medium. I swear that one of these days I'll find my lane. There are things I like and dislike about oils, acrylic, and watercolor. There's not a perfect medium, but oils sure are easier for working on composition and value.  As the year is coming to an end, I'm wrapping some things up and getting ready to launch other things. I went through my last three years of paintings (about 150) and categorized them as keep for myself, make available for gifts or purchase, or repurpose (at first I had labeled them trash, but that just seemed so mean, and I really can use the paper for other things). With the gift/sell category, I created a PowerPoint file with all available paintings, categorized by subject. Each was labeled and priced...a scary declaration on my part that my creativity is valuable. In the coming year, I will use this file to create a new website for my growing a...

Down the Value Study Rabbit Hole

What's the best way to create a value study for me? I'm trying to figure that out. And how to paint from it once I've done it? I'm trying to figure that out, too. Been re-reading Ian Roberts' Mastering Composition . Have re-dedicated myself to working on a value composition a day (my original goal). He promises that a year of these daily compositions will make a HUGE difference in my art. Even with the few I've done, I'm seeing improvement and I'm asking a lot more questions, which I think means I'm on the right track for me right now.   Overall, I've done five value studies of the rose, and it's getting tedious. But each one had me asking another question, so I continued on. It was a great exercise, trying different methods. I should have done one last one, a pencil sketch, but I've run out of steam. What's interesting, though, is that they all look similar yet different. Referring to the quad image at right, the simplest studies (3 ...

Finishing My Acrylic Complementary Study

I'm rereading Carlson's Guide to Landscape Painting, as I've decided that I really miss painting landscapes, especially in plein air, but the reason I stopped doing it was because I wasn't happy with my results and I wasn't making progress (ugh, watercolors!). Carlson's book is  DENSE. I gave up highlighting it because almost every paragraph would need a highlight, but I am typing up notes as I read, with the hopes of eventually creating a cheat sheet for myself.  One of the first lessons he writes about is his "theory of angles," where, for an average landscape, the sky, ground, trees, and mountains have certain relative values. Thinking about the six studies I just completed , I realized that I had arbitrarily assigned the sky a mid value, to make the house more the focal point, but according to Carlson, the sky should be the lightest value of the natural objects. Oops. So I redid the value study, using his theory. I kind of like it. Looks more ...